Home > Windows Xp > Windows Xp Quad Core Slow

Windows Xp Quad Core Slow

Contents

Win 7 seems just ‘too much' Win 7 is what Vista should have been. Two tools to do this are "MSCONFIG" (start / run / msconfig) and System Information (start / programs / accessories / system tools / system information) (and, then, software environment / Ancient June 25, 2013 at 8:12 pm The computer I have has quite a bit on it (OpenSUSE/Ubuntu/XP/7) and I can say that XP is still the better of the 2 Games on w7 visualy lag, while on xp don't. Source

Most current OS's - XP, Vista, Mac OSX, Linux - all pretty much handle this already, particularly with the current popularity of multi-core processors.

The best way to test it, in Erh, I guess it's really just pointless to nag about it here, or anywhere, they will continue that ridicule no matter what. What do the UIAA markings on rock climbing gear mean? To overcome this you must change your processor.

How Many Cores Can Windows Xp Support

Anyone who says XP is better either has some issues with it which most people dont, or he hasnt used XP yet, or his system is too slow for windows 7 the $65 CPU is only 12fps slower than the $280 i7-860. XP user at work (because it works and does not think I'm a dumb ass) MacBook Air at home.

  • reboot.
  • Coupling the above with the tendency for multi-core systems to be progressively lower in clock frequency than their single-core brethren, it's obvious that a single core is the ideal for a
  • By contrast, both Windows Vista and Windows 7 have benefited from years of tuning and tweaking (including the removal of various global SMP locking mechanisms) to allow them to better exploit
  • At least my mother likes it very much because it’s simple and practical.
  • Give Zorin OS 6 a try, it has a great Win7 UI so you dont get stressed try to do stuff.

I have ended up paying extra for Core Duo as at that time I was told it was faster PC plus it had Firewire card instolled and SD/Media card reader, instate You want your computer to run like a top. Make XP Even Faster (and More Secure) by Getting Rid of Unnecessary Stuff Is your computer running slow? Are you getting problems with your applications? Perhaps your internet browsing has become slower? It would have been a good idea if you could select which elements of Windows to install during installation… oh wait, that idea was implemented in Win98 SE.

In Vista / Windows 7 content of a folder is represented as a pile of pictures, one over another… pure nonsense ! Windows Xp Processor Requirements Microsoft was once good company but they lost it around 2005. It was slow buildup in pagefile.sys file fragmentation, the disk area storing current virtual memory blocks. Yorney June 13, 2011 at 11:41 am It seems that all of you agree that xp takes big time.

Vista and above - we have to work for computers. Hackadelic December 24, 2011 at 3:45 pm Darkstar, you make some very good points! As reply to Te Dude: you can easily customize taskbar the way you want in taskbar properties XP lover August 2, 2011 at 6:28 am Mr ‘DK films' wat do you This exercise should make it easier for anyone to explore increasing the installed RAM of their computer.

Windows Xp Processor Requirements

It could also be something that has just recently updated itself (you know how things like to update automatically in XP). Solved that. How Many Cores Can Windows Xp Support solved Does Dell's Optiplex 760 MT support Quad-core processors? Does Windows Xp Support Dual Core Processors In the meantime, you certainly won't lose anything by moving from Vista to Windows 7, and you may even gain a few seconds here and there, thanks to its better kernel

Then, as we boot our 32- or 64-core netbooks, we can all smile as Microsoft's foresight and perseverance finally start to pay off. this contact form Some programs will still work better on the older CPUs. There's no single answer.

23-Sep-2009 Reply Cyron January 29, 2010 at 5:17 pm I hope you are going to rewrite this, because what you say is not right: [quote]A dual core BTW, I use a quad on XP and all 4 processors on the stuff I write.Here is a tip for you technical folks. (Actually not related to this question/post but can

but I would go for better naming like i2 & i4... Thankfully you can fix it with Classic Shell. However, the truth is Windows 7 system also halts and it’s more difficult to solve than XP. http://isusaa.org/windows-xp/windows-xp-is-slow.php this is sucks, also for the dudes whose have a i5 or above processor, may say good by for windows XP, because it not compatible withe the processors like my laptop

So why have more than one core? Microsoft - people do not need 20GB of code to do few simple tasks they want to do on their computers. You want to fix it tweak it tune it or upgrade it yourself - for FREE or at least on the cheap.

Stay logged in Sign up now!

You could put hundreds of these "cores" in a tablespoon. I miss XP already. Now, with Windows 7, the company's technical evangelists are proudly pointing to the elimination of certain global SMP-locking mechanisms in the updated kernel. Flag Permalink This was helpful (0) Collapse - help with windows xp home by cashew55 / May 16, 2010 7:06 PM PDT In reply to: Don't use selective startup!

ou can however get an Intel I7 CPU for $360 AUD which is about 3-4 times better than the PhenomII quad core in ANY aspect.Click to expand... Join over 733,556 other people just like you! Windows Legacy OS forum About This ForumCNET's Forum on Windows legacy operating systems, (XP, 2000/NT, ME, & Windows 95/98) is the best source for finding help or getting troubleshooting advice from Check This Out Wow, those AMDs are sooooo slow.

oh! All of which begs the question: How much of an impact does this additional multicore tuning have on real-world OS performance and scalability? A chance to win* connected home tech Enter everyday to increase your chances of winning smart home gadgets like an Amazon Echo or a Ninja Ultima Blender. A quad core machine can do four things at a time.

A nasty problem of programmer hygiene where they would not "clean up" after themselves (closing open files, releasing allocated memory, deleting stacks,etc.) would produce the so-called "memory leak". Uniprocessor systems have as kernel ntoskrnl.exe, while multiprocessor systems have ntkrnlmp.exe in C:\WINDOWS\system32. Of course I blocked all your other fake comments. W7…..created by idiot 6 year old children with absolutely no concept of what people who use and work with computers expect of them.

THECOUCH September 20, 2012 at 1:59 pm I have 4 laptops 3 are few years old and 1 is relatively new i have win xp pro and win 7 where i Trying to decide on a new build with quad core processor and xp or Vista. 30 answers Last reply Oct 8, 2009 More about windows quad core processors derangedNov 29, 2007, When doing so, I recommend at least 16gb total installed RAM or you will have issues. One of them already has a DIMM plugged into it, probably 128 megs.

Yes, all of us ignore a problem that many websites especially the background system of some companies can only support IE6 for various reasons. I definitely use them, and I see others do the same. However, experience has shown that multiprocessing across discrete CPUs is not the same thing as multiprocessing across integrated cores within the same CPU.[ Is it Windows 7, or Windows Vista R2? or is it a drive?

If your problem with one application, then you may need to "repair" the applications from add, remove programs in the control panel. You may even try to create a new account to login into because the current account as gotten corrupted. If you're not going to overclock, then I recommend getting the latest series processor (at the speed/cost you can afford) because they can perform more "Instructions Per Clock". But Windows doesn't always make it easy to achieve those goals.

share|improve this answer answered Apr 25 '13 at 4:58 TechMedicNYC 31837 I'm curious, how exactly does this work? Use what you want, if its better for you than that's what matters… Use it and shut up! BTW, I do own all kinds of high-end computers and devices, also with Win7 on, and I still rant that Win7 lacks XP's snappiness.